May 11, 2010 - Corriere della Sera - pag. 7, is published an interview with the lawyer. Nicola Morvillo said that the position of the party:
"Families Bears and Mazzoni not want to distort what is an institution for Milan.
= Why they went to court for eviction executive, if only an issue for them to adjust the rent?
simply ask a market rent, in '98 a new contract: a 12 000 euro per month. (12,000 x 12 months = € 144,000) Twelve years have passed since then. And for those 250 square feet of local wineries and 150 owners now ask for "an appropriate royalty to the current market value": "A figure of around € 500 000 per year, since in that area we are talking about at least 1800 € per meter for the noble parts and 450 for the other. "
= Excuse me, but an adjustment of 300% I feel slightly out of business. =
But why the shop / office next to the restaurant of their property is always rented in 1200/1300 € per meter?
Among other things, "when the part of my clients was sent a cancellation of the contract, no proposal came from the leads. In late January, was notified of the license for rent and over again the Pepori not stepped forward.
= Normally the landlord that the tenant makes a new proposal, not the other way.
= My wife and I, for about a 'year, the first letter end of lease we asked Dr. Mazzoni about the renewal of the lease, but for most of the time we got evasive answers. At my last request for a meeting I was told quote "My cousins \u200b\u200bwant to deal through a lawyer."
Suddenly, then, showed up in court advancing the successful submission of an application for entry of the premises as a cultural asset. "
= The lawyer said he was not you give us to him in court for termination, eviction and obtain executive. Clearly if one is called into question how can you defend.
objection of the lawyer: "But even if the lien was imposed by local historian, certainly not the managers could be imposed (i Pepori).
= It seems to me that after 85 years of business and the work of three generations, a little recognition can be granted.
Lawyer Morvillo concludes: "The judge has postponed the decision on expulsion in the grounds invoked the" undisputed cultural relevance "of the restaurant and the" regulatory evolution in progress "as reasons to justify the granting of the order does not release . But when the rules that apply are those in force and are very clear. Also ask for this in advance of the hearing. "
= Probably the lawyer forgot to mention another piece of the sentence, which tells of "the breach by the lessor reporting requirements under Article. 40 L. 392/78, for the purpose of pre-emption by the tenant.
0 comments:
Post a Comment